Alle anmeldelsene på Metacritic hyller Uncharted 4: A Thief's End opp i skyene, men det er naturligvis ett unntak. Det er anmeldelsen til amerikanske Washington Post som til tross for at den er publisert uten en karakter står oppført på Metacritic med 40 av 100.
Dette har så langt opprørt 8000 personer nok til å signere en underskriftskampanje for å få anmeldelsen fjernet fra nettsiden som samler karakterer. Begrunnelsen er at Washington Post ikke har satt noen karakter, men beskrivelsen på Change.org handler enda mer om at anmelderens personlige mening er feil.
Her er beskrivelsen, komplett med alle skrivefeilene den er postet med:
"Im sorry but when having too much detail became a bad thing , this reviewer is out of his mind. I believe Uncharted 4 is one of the greatest games ever created and it is my personal favorite for sure , although i can justify some reviewers giving it a 9 or an 8. But this is an utter disgrace. Gene , because you were the only respectable staff that responded to this nonsense , you should remove this review from the Metacritic , and post a new , sensible one that can justify its existence. You're Washington post for Christ's Sake , not a 12-year-old's diary. Treat the game with professionalism and respect.
Also , he never gave the game a rating in his review , so the 40/100 should either be removed from the Metascore or added to his review. Things must be cleared. It's about the respect that the developers deserve for all the amount of time and money put into this game. Even the editor of the Washington post is confused with this piece of biased journalism. Something needs to happen. Just look at the track record of this guy , Dark souls 2 worst game ever? One of the most acclaimed games in recent memory? Im okay with the guy expressing his opinion , but as i said , when its an official review it must be treated with professionalism and respect , and rules must be applied. This guy doesn't deserve to be taken seriously by big , crucial sites like Metacritic. It harms the Flawless reputation of the game for absolutely no reason. A review is not about what you think a game is , its about what a game is. Objective measures are applied."
Hva mener du om dette?